Posts
For the very same reasons...i dont think we shud gamble our mediocre "nobody in big picture" lives...we shud stay safe than be sorry. The social psychological take is to not create global mass panic bcoz its a bad bad pandemic... They can then, argue for the sake of being free n for the "bigger players"(politicians, pharmaceutical companies, emerging economies, military power" etc) - to keep making money. Arguments are endless.
What we need to do as individuals is to think. Without prejudice..wht is best for us, average day to day people...precaution or dilussion?
Covid 19 has sent the world into a delayed recession which was inevitable. Markets work on 12yr cycles of boom n bust. We hv not had a bust yet...ALL "research" shud be analysed further.
Being a researcher in psychology..i will share.. We are "taught" to analyse to meet our "answers". "Nothing is without flaws". Bearing this in mind...given this situation, a global recession is not beneficial to the powers tht b nor us regular folk. But realistically, it is the powers tht be tht caused this thru policy making, which we weren't actively a part of. I will substantiate with examples: 1) the mass moving of manufacturing industries to China purely bcoz of cost. Many nations had to lay ppl off jobs coz industries moved to slave labour china
2) industries had ONE goal : profit maximising. Which China was happy to provide
3) China has never been historically known (1900-2020) to really pioneer anything. They r experts at "knock offs"!
4) Being communists, they followed the old "Nippon model" of "Economic conquering" which failed for Japan. The Japanese realised in early 2000s tht unless they "pioneer" technology, they will be left behind. They stepped back n worked on "innovation". They fell back in the "dog eat dog" competition of money for a while.5) Covid19 is a blessing in disguise... a correction of mentality n greed which researchers predict will involve the diminishing of 33% of the already overly populated Mother Earth.
My example for this is the stance the UK has taken thus far.. "herd immunity" which loosely translates to genocide-ethnic cleansing. Only survival of the fittest.
This msg wasnt intended to be a "colloquim publication" so I will stop here. Pls pm if you wish to discuss further.
-Rosh Vettiveloo- MEdSpEd @RoshVettiveloo
0 Comments